Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891503›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Relational reasoning network for anatomical landmarking.

Neslisah Torosdagli, Syed Anwar, Payal Verma, Denise K Liberton, Janice S Lee, Wade W Han, Ulas Bagci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neslisah TorosdagliUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States.
Syed AnwarUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States.
Payal VermaNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Craniofacial Anomalies and Regeneration Section, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Denise K LibertonNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Craniofacial Anomalies and Regeneration Section, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Janice S LeeNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Craniofacial Anomalies and Regeneration Section, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Wade W HanBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Boston, Maryland, United States.
Ulas BagciUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7379-6829
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Central Florida · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Radiologist-Centered Artificial Intelligence (RCAI) for Lung Cancer Screening and DiagnosisR01CA240639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We perform anatomical landmarking for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bones without explicitly segmenting them. Toward this, we propose a simple, yet efficient, deep network architecture, called relational reasoning network (RRN), to accurately learn the local and the global relations among the landmarks in CMF bones; specifically, mandible, maxilla, and nasal bones. Approach: The proposed RRN works in an end-to-end manner, utilizing learned relations of the landmarks based on dense-block units. For a given few landmarks as input, RRN treats the landmarking process similar to a data imputation problem where predicted landmarks are considered missing. Results: We applied RRN to cone-beam computed tomography scans obtained from 250 patients. With a fourfold cross-validation technique, we obtained an average root mean squared error of Conclusions: Accurately identifying anatomical landmarks is a crucial step in deformation analysis and surgical planning for CMF surgeries. Achieving this goal without the need for explicit bone segmentation addresses a major limitation of segmentation-based approaches, where segmentation failure (as often is the case in bones with severe pathology or deformation) could easily lead to incorrect landmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first-of-its-kind algorithm finding anatomical relations of the objects using deep learning.

Indexed as

anatomical landmarkingcraniomaxillofacial bonesdeep relational learningrelational reasoningsurgical modeling

Identifiers

PMID36891503
PMCPMC9986769
OpenAlexW4323318254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.