Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891384›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Comparative metagenomic analysis reveals rhizosphere microbial community composition and functions help protect grapevines against salt stress.

Bo Wang, Xicheng Wang, Zhuangwei Wang, Kefeng Zhu, Weimin Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Co-expression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo WangInstitute of Pomology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xicheng WangInstitute of Pomology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhuangwei WangInstitute of Pomology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Kefeng ZhuDepartment of Technology Commercialization, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Weimin WuInstitute of Pomology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInstitute of Pomology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soil salinization is a serious abiotic stress for grapevines. The rhizosphere microbiota of plants can help counter the negative effects caused by salt stress, but the distinction between rhizosphere microbes of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive varieties remains unclear. Methods: This study employed metagenomic sequencing to explore the rhizosphere microbial community of grapevine rootstocks 101-14 (salt tolerant) and 5BB (salt sensitive) with or without salt stress. Results and Discussion: Compared to the control (treated with ddH

Indexed as

grapevinemetagenomicsmicrobial variationrhizosphererootstocksulfur metabolism

Identifiers

PMID36891384
PMCPMC9987714
OpenAlexW4321375980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.