Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891107›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosciences in rural practice

Expanding access to microneurosurgery in low-resource settings: Feasibility of a low-cost exoscope in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Manuel Encarnacion Ramirez, Ismael Peralta, Renat Nurmukhametov, Rossi Evelyn Barrientos Castillo, Juan Sebastian Castro, Alexander Volovich, Medet Dosanov, Ibrahim E Efe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosciences in rural practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuel Encarnacion RamirezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ismael PeraltaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Alejandro Cabral Hospital, San Juan de la Maguana, Dominican Republic.
Renat NurmukhametovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Rossi Evelyn Barrientos CastilloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Juan Sebastian CastroDepartment of Spine Surgery, Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Alexander VolovichDepartment of Spine Surgery, Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Medet DosanovDepartment of Spine Surgery, Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ibrahim E EfeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Less than a quarter of the world population has access to microneurosurgical care within a range of 2 h. We introduce a simplified exoscopic visualization system for low-resource settings. Materials and Methods: We purchased a 48 megapixels microscope camera with a c-mount lens and a ring light at a total cost of US$ 125. Sixteen patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease were divided into an exoscope group and a microscope group. In each group, we performed four open and four minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). We conducted a questionnaire-based assessment of the user experience. Results: The exoscope achieved similar outcomes with comparable blood loss and operating time as the microscope. It provided similar image quality and magnification. Yet, it lacked stereoscopic perception and the adjustability of the camera position was cumbersome. Most users strongly agreed the exoscope would significantly improve surgical teaching. Over 75% reported that they would recommend the exoscope to colleagues and all users saw its great potential for low-resource environments. Conclusion: Our low-budget exoscope is safe and feasible for TLIF and purchasable at a fraction of the cost of conventional microscopes. It may thus help expand access to neurosurgical care and training worldwide.

Indexed as

ExoscopeGlobal neurosurgeryLow costSpine surgerySurgical ergonomics

Identifiers

PMID36891107
PMCPMC9945030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.