Broadening the scope for three-dimensional printed airway stents.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. 4D Printing in Biomedical Implants and Functional Healthcare Devices.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
   Review
2. Narrative review of malignant central airway obstruction: management updates.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025
   Review
3. A beginner's guide to using personalised three-dimensional airway stents.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
   Review
4. A three dimensional printed endobronchial stent for the treatment of a broncho-esophageal fistula.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025
   Article
5. Advances in studies on tracheal stent design addressing the related complications.Materials today. Bio · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.