Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36891035›Full record

ArticleOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science2022

Expectancy Effects Threaten the Inferential Validity of Synchrony-Prosociality Research.

S Atwood, Adena Schachner, Samuel A Mehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward a productive evolutionary understanding of music.The Behavioral and brain sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Origins of music in credible signaling.The Behavioral and brain sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S AtwoodDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2889-9575
Adena SchachnerDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6886-7098
Samuel A MehrHaskins Laboratories, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9400-7718

Funding

Psychological functions of music in infancyDP5OD024566 · OD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEHR, SAMUEL A · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
NIH HHS DP5 OD024566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies argue that synchronized movement increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. We reviewed meta-analytic evidence that reported effects of synchrony may be driven by experimenter expectancy, leading to experimenter bias; and participant expectancy, otherwise known as placebo effects. We found that a majority of published studies do not adequately control for experimenter bias and that multiple independent replication attempts with added controls have failed to find the original effects. In a preregistered experiment, we measured participant expectancy directly, asking whether participants have

Indexed as

expectancyexperimenter biasplacebo effectsprosocialitysynchrony

Identifiers

PMID36891035
PMCPMC9987344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.