ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Recent advances in tendon tissue engineering strategy.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (dECM) in Tendon Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Thickness-Tunable Bilayer PBAT Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Enhancing r-AdMSCs' Tenogenic Commitment in Supraspinatus Tendon Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Constructs for Achilles Tendon Regeneration and their Translation to Human Medicine.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Nanofiber based transformative approaches for tendon regenerative engineering: past, present and future.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Review
- Transcriptomic and functional comparison of adipose-and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tendon regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Tendon healing in the era of regenerative medicine: literature review.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Recent progress in macrophage-mediated tendon injury and healing.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- Corrigendum to "Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration" [Mater. Today Bio 35 (2025) 102571].Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Progressing Regenerative Medicine: Integrating Bioprinting Platforms for Stem Cell Applications.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances in Achilles Tendon Tissue Engineering: Integrating Cells, Scaffolds, and Mechanical Loading for Functional Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Stem cell approaches for tendon repair: delusion or insight.The Journal of physiology · 2025Review
- Bioprinting revolution: Innovative design of 3D bioactive scaffolds for living organs and transdermal tissues.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Implications of Tissue Engineering for Tendon Repair and Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Dialdehyde Starch Cross-Linked Collagen with Heparin Conjugation: Characterization and Feasibility Study for Osteochondral Tissue Repair.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engineering Lignin-Based Tubular Hydrogel Scaffolds for Load-Bearing Biomedical Applications.ChemSusChem · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Medical-Grade Polycaprolactone for 3D Printing: Mechanical, Chemical, and Biodegradation Characteristics.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tendon injuries often result in significant pain and disability and impose severe clinical and financial burdens on our society. Despite considerable achievements in the field of regenerative medicine in the past several decades, effective treatments remain a challenge due to the limited natural healing capacity of tendons caused by poor cell density and vascularization. The development of tissue engineering has provided more promising results in regenerating tendon-like tissues with compositional, structural and functional characteristics comparable to those of native tendon tissues. Tissue engineering is the discipline of regenerative medicine that aims to restore the physiological functions of tissues by using a combination of cells and materials, as well as suitable biochemical and physicochemical factors. In this review, following a discussion of tendon structure, injury and healing, we aim to elucidate the current strategies (biomaterials, scaffold fabrication techniques, cells, biological adjuncts, mechanical loading and bioreactors, and the role of macrophage polarization in tendon regeneration), challenges and future directions in the field of tendon tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.