ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis and Regulatory Role of Sucrose inMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- An EndophyticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Bacterial Cyclic Lipopeptides as Triggers of Plant Immunity and Systemic Resistance Against Pathogens.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biotic Stress Alleviation in Plant Using Rhizobacteria: An Overview of Mechanism of Action, Antimicrobial Compounds Production, (Nano) Formulations and Employment Methods.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Integration of single-nuclei transcriptome and bulk RNA-seq to unravel the role of AhWRKY70 in regulating stem cell development in Arachis hypogaea L.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- From genome to field:Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- The soil-borne fungal pathogen Athelia rolfsii: past, present, and future concern in legumes.Folia microbiologica · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peanut ( Results and discussion: Upon growth under the nutritional conditions dictated by peanut root exudation, the bacterium efficiently produces the three types of lipopeptides surfactin, iturin and fengycin known for their antagonistic activities against a wide range of fungal phytopathogens. By testing a range of GA1 mutants specifically repressed in the production of those metabolites, we point out an important role for iturin and another unidentified compound in the antagonistic activity against the pathogen. Biocontrol experiments performed in greenhouse further revealed the efficacy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.