Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890849›Full record

ReviewActa histochemica et cytochemica2023

Application of Immunohistochemistry in Clinical Practices as a Standardized Assay for Breast Cancer.

Shinobu Masuda, Yoko Nakanishi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta histochemica et cytochemica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shinobu MasudaDivision of Oncologic Pathology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Ohyaguchikami-cho 30-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
Yoko NakanishiDivision of Oncologic Pathology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Ohyaguchikami-cho 30-1, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an indispensable tool in the clinical practices for breast cancer; however, to achieve its standardization, numerous issues need to be overcome. In this review, we describe the development of IHC as an important clinical tool, and the challenges in standardizing IHC results for patients. We also present ideas for resolving the remaining issues and unmet needs, along with future directions.

Indexed as

breast cancerclinical practiceimmunohistochemistrystandardization

Identifiers

PMID36890849
PMCPMC9986307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.