Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890841›Full record

ReviewGlobal cardiology science & practice2023

Molecular autopsy in sudden cardiac death.

Oscar Campuzano, Georgia Sarquella-Brugada

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global cardiology science & practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. SCN5AInternational journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. From rare events to systematic data collection: the RESCUED registry for sudden cardiac death in the young in Germany.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Molecular autopsy for sudden death in Japan.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar CampuzanoMedical Science Department, School of Medicine, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Georgia Sarquella-BrugadaMedical Science Department, School of Medicine, Universitat de Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A post-mortem genetic analysis in the process of investigating a sudden death episode is known as 'molecular autopsy'. It is usually performed in cases without a conclusive cause of death and after a comprehensive medico-legal autopsy. In these sudden unexplained death cases, an underlying inherited arrhythmogenic cardiac disease is the main suspected cause of death. The objective is to unravel a genetic diagnosis of the victim, but it also enables cascade genetic screening of the victim's relatives. Early identification of a deleterious genetic alteration associated with an inherited arrhythmogenic disease may help to adopt preventive personalized measures to reduce risk of malignant arrhythmias and sudden death. It is important to remark that the first symptom of an inherited arrhythmogenic cardiac disease may the malignant arrhythmia and even sudden death. Next-generation sequencing allows a rapid and cost-effectives genetic analysis. Close interaction between the forensic scientist, pathologist, cardiologist, pediatric cardiologist and geneticist has allowed a progressive increase of genetic yield in recent years, identifying the pathogenic genetic alteration. However, large numbers of rare genetic alterations remain classified as having an ambiguous role, impeding a proper genetic interpretation and useful translation into both forensic and cardiological arena.

Identifiers

PMID36890841
PMCPMC9988296
OpenAlexW4319296989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.