Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890575›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical genomics2023

Diagnostic accuracy of circular RNA for diabetes Mellitus: a systematic review and diagnostic Meta-analysis.

Hojat Dehghanbanadaki, Pooria Asili, Abdolkarim Haji Ghadery, Maryam Mirahmad, Ali Zare Dehnavi, Amirhossein Parsaei, Hamid Reza Baradaran, Mobin Azami, Gustavo Jose Justo da Silva, Reza Parvan and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The therapeutic potential of circular RNAs.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hojat Dehghanbanadaki *Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pooria Asili *Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdolkarim Haji GhaderyDepartment of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam MirahmadEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Zare DehnaviEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein ParsaeiEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid Reza BaradaranAgeing Clinical & Experimental Research Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mobin AzamiStudent Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Gustavo Jose Justo da SilvaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Reza ParvanInstitute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Yousef MoradiSocial Determinant of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. Yousefmoradi211@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the pooled diagnostic ability of circular RNA (circRNA) molecules for diabetes mellitus.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies. A total of 2070 participants, including 775 diabetic patients and 1295 healthy individuals, from five studies were included in this meta-analysis. True positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative data were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. The Deeks' funnel plot was applied for publication bias assessment, Cochran's Q test and I2 index were applied for inter-study heterogeneity assessment. Besides, a subgroup analysis was performed for determining the source of heterogeneity between studies. P value < 0.05 was considered significance. All analysis were done by STATA version 14.

resultsCircRNA presented a sensitivity of 76% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 66-84%), specificity of 77% (95%CI: 58-89%), positive LR of 3.25 (95%CI: 1.69-6.23), negative LR of 0.31 (95%CI: 0.21-0.46), DOR of 10.41 (95%CI: 4.26-25.41), and AUC of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.79-0.85) for diabetes mellitus detection. More specifically, hsa_circ_0054633 showed a sensitivity of 67% (95%CI: 53-81%) and a specificity of 82% (95%CI: 63-100%).

conclusionCircRNAs show highly accurate diagnostic capability for type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus. High sensitivity of circRNAs introduces them as potential noninvasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and their high specificity introduces them as potential therapeutic targets by regulation of their expression.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2RNA, CircularBiomarkersHumansROC CurveBiomarkersRNA, CircularBiomarkercircRNAsDiabetesDiagnosisMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36890575
PMCPMC9993609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.