Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890548›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT).

Sophie Tasseel-Ponche, Martine Roussel, Monica N Toba, Thibaud Sader, Vincent Barbier, Arnaud Delafontaine, Jonathan Meynier, Carl Picard, Jean-Marc Constans, Alexis Schnitzler and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03009773 (The Multitasking Rehabilitation She Enhanced Walking Speed Compared to the Simple Post Stroke Rehabilitation Task), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03009773 naterminatednot on this map

The Multitasking Rehabilitation She Enhanced Walking Speed Compared to the Simple Post Stroke Rehabilitation Task (AVC)?

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRan2017 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsSubacute StrokeArmsrehabilitation multitasking walking., Traditional walking rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie Tasseel-PoncheDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France. stasseel@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-1732
Martine RousselLaboratory of Functional Neurosciences, UR UPJV 4559, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Monica N TobaLaboratory of Functional Neurosciences, UR UPJV 4559, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-2271
Thibaud SaderDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Vincent BarbierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Arnaud DelafontaineDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Jonathan MeynierClinical Research and Innovation Directorate, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Carl PicardClinical Research and Innovation Directorate, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Jean-Marc ConstansDepartment of Radiology, Amiens, University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Alexis SchnitzlerPRM Department, Hôpital Lariboisière-F.Widal AP-HP, Paris, France.
Olivier GodefroyLaboratory of Functional Neurosciences, UR UPJV 4559, Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Alain Pierre YelnikPRM Department, Hôpital Lariboisière-F.Widal AP-HP, Paris, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire de neurosciences fonctionnelles et pathologies · FR

Funding

French Ministry of Health PHRCI-15-091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait disorders and cognitive impairments are prime causes of disability and institutionalization after stroke. We hypothesized that relative to single-task gait rehabilitation (ST GR), cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) GR initiated at the subacute stage would be associated with greater improvements in ST and DT gait, balance, and cognitive performance, personal autonomy, disability, and quality of life in the short, medium and long terms after stroke.

methodsThis multicenter (n=12), two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled clinical study is a superiority trial. With p<0.05, a power of 80%, and an expected loss to follow-up rate of 10%, the inclusion of 300 patients will be required to evidence a 0.1-m.s DISCUSSION: The main study limitation is the open design. The trial will focus on a new GR program applicable at various stages after stroke and during neurological disease.

trial registrationNCT03009773 . Registered on January 4, 2017.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultCognitionEquivalence Trials as TopicExercise TherapyGaitHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWalkingCognitive-motor interferenceGaitMultitaskProtocolQuality of lifeRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID36890548
PMCPMC9994785
OpenAlexW4323546099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.