ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023
Correction to: Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Academic misconduct and artificial intelligence use by medical students, interns and PhD students in Ukraine: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence: The researcher's assistant or sheep in wolf's clothing?United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Medical knowledge of ChatGPT in public health, infectious diseases, COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccines: multiple choice questions examination based performance.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Applications and implementation of generative artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging with a focus on ethical and legal considerations: what cardiovascular imagers need to know!BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Clinical Research With Large Language Models Generated Writing-Clinical Research with AI-assisted Writing (CRAW) Study.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- How could ChatGPT impact my practice as an intensivist? An overview of potential applications, risks and limitations.Intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence hallucinations.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Review
- Comparing the Efficacy of Large Language Models ChatGPT, BARD, and Bing AI in Providing Information on Rhinoplasty: An Observational Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2023Article
- Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing.Current research in insect science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.