ArticleBMC public health2023
A longitudinal study of capability-based quality of life and mental health in the first 5-months of lockdown restrictions in the UK.
Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID19, and associated lockdown restrictions, have impacted on people's daily lives. Understanding the mental health and wellbeing implications of these impacts has been identified as a public health research priority.
aimsBuilding on an earlier cross-sectional study, the current study sought to investigate whether capability-based quality of life changed during the first 5-months of lock-down restrictions in the UK, and whether capability-based quality of life was predictive of future levels of depression and anxiety.
methodsAn initial convenience sample of 594 participants were followed up at three different timepoints spanning a 20-week time-period between March 2020 and August 2020. Participants provided demographic information and completed the Oxford Capabilities Questionnaire - Mental Health (OxCAP-MH), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
resultsThe mean scores indicated that levels of both depression and anxiety decreased across the three timepoints, whereas capability-based QoL (as assessed by the OxCAP-MH) decreased over time. Capability-based QoL predicted additional levels of variance in both depression and anxiety levels when time and sociodemographic factors were controlled for. Cross-lagged panel model analyses indicated that capability-based QoL over a month into lockdown restrictions predicted levels of depression and anxiety 5 months into the restrictions.
conclusionsThe study findings suggest that the capability-limiting impact of public health emergencies and related lockdown restrictions are important for understanding peoples' levels of depression and anxiety. The implications that the findings have for the provision of support in the context of public health emergencies and associated restrictions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.