Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890476›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

A scoping review of facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of surveillance and oral cholera vaccine interventions for cholera control in lower- and middle-income countries.

Hanna Trolle, Birger Forsberg, Carina King, Oluwatosin Akande, Stephanie Ayres, Tobias Alfvén, Kelly Elimian

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plant-based edible vaccines: Can cholera be the case study in Africa?Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Comprehensive Review on the Use of Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) in Ethiopia: 2019 to 2023.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Review
  12. Development of practical emergency simulation training in primary health care: Lessons learnt.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanna TrolleDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. hanna.trolle@gmail.com.
Birger ForsbergDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carina KingDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Oluwatosin AkandeNigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria.
Stephanie AyresDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias AlfvénDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kelly ElimianDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SENigeria Centre for Disease Control · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera still affects millions of people worldwide, especially in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The Global Task Force on Cholera Control (GTFCC) has identified surveillance and oral cholera vaccines as two critical interventions to actualise the global roadmap goals-reduction of cholera-related deaths by 90% and decreasing the number of cholera endemic countries by half by 2030. Therefore, this study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing these two cholera interventions in LMIC settings.

methodsA scoping review using the methods presented by Arksey and O'Malley. The search strategy involved using key search terms (cholera, surveillance, epidemiology and vaccines) in three databases (PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science) and reviewing the first ten pages of Google searches. The eligibility criteria of being conducted in LMICs, a timeline of 2011-2021 and documents only in English were applied. Thematic analysis was performed, and the findings were presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension.

resultsThirty-six documents met the predefined inclusion criteria, covering 2011 to 2021. There were two themes identified regarding the implementation of surveillance: timeliness and reporting (1); and resources and laboratory capabilities (2). As for oral cholera vaccines, there were four themes identified: information and awareness (1); community acceptance and trusted community leaders (2); planning and coordination (3); and resources and logistics (4). Additionally, adequate resources, good planning and coordination were identified to be operating at the interface between surveillance and oral cholera vaccines.

conclusionFindings suggest that adequate and sustainable resources are crucial for timely and accurate cholera surveillance and that oral cholera vaccine implementation would benefit from increased community awareness and engagement of community leaders.

Indexed as

CholeraCholera VaccinesAdvisory CommitteesDeveloping CountriesHumansCholera VaccinesCholeraCholera VaccinesEpidemiologyScoping reviewSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36890476
PMCPMC9994404
OpenAlexW4323545313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.