Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36890453›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Application of machine learning to identify risk factors of birth asphyxia.

Fatemeh Darsareh, Amene Ranjbar, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Vahid Mehrnoush, Mitra Shekari, Malihe Shirzadfard Jahromi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Digital Technology in Preventing Anemia Among Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatemeh DarsarehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Amene RanjbarFertility and Infertility Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Mohammadsadegh Vahidi FarashahEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Vahid MehrnoushMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. vahidmehrnoush7@gmail.com.
Mitra ShekariMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Malihe Shirzadfard JahromiMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping a prediction model that incorporates several risk factors and accurately calculates the overall risk of birth asphyxia is necessary. The present study used a machine learning model to predict birth asphyxia.

methodsWomen who gave birth at a tertiary Hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, were retrospectively evaluated from January 2020 to January 2022. Data were extracted from the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network, a valid national system, by trained recorders using electronic medical records. Demographic factors, obstetric factors, and prenatal factors were obtained from patient records. Machine learning was used to identify the risk factors of birth asphyxia. Eight machine learning models were used in the study. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of each model, six metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score were measured in the test set.

resultsOf 8888 deliveries, we identified 380 women with a recorded birth asphyxia, giving a frequency of 4.3%. Random Forest Classification was found to be the best model to predict birth asphyxia with an accuracy of 0.99. The analysis of the importance of the variables showed that maternal chronic hypertension, maternal anemia, diabetes, drug addiction, gestational age, newborn weight, newborn sex, preeclampsia, placenta abruption, parity, intrauterine growth retardation, meconium amniotic fluid, mal-presentation, and delivery method were considered to be the weighted factors.

conclusionBirth asphyxia can be predicted using a machine learning model. Random Forest Classification was found to be an accurate algorithm to predict birth asphyxia. More research should be done to analyze appropriate variables and prepare big data to determine the best model.

Indexed as

AsphyxiaElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIranMachine LearningPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBirth asphyxiaMachine learningRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36890453
PMCPMC9993370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.