ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023
Application of machine learning to identify risk factors of birth asphyxia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph neural networks for networked analysis of gestational diabetes risk factors: a multi method framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable machine learning model for identifying key risk factors in congenital heart disease prediction using questionnaire data: a retrospective case-control study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Optimized ensemble learning framework for neonatal asphyxia prediction using perinatal clinical features.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning model to identify the predictors of the neonatal intensive care unit admission.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based application for predicting some pregnancy outcomes: a multi-phase study protocol.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning in identifying risk factors for low APGAR scores.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Proposing a machine learning-based model for predicting nonreassuring fetal heart.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Machine learning algorithms to predict epidural-related maternal fever: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The Role of Digital Technology in Preventing Anemia Among Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in VSD prenatal diagnosis from fetal heart ultrasound images.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based approach for predicting low birth weight.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeveloping a prediction model that incorporates several risk factors and accurately calculates the overall risk of birth asphyxia is necessary. The present study used a machine learning model to predict birth asphyxia.
methodsWomen who gave birth at a tertiary Hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, were retrospectively evaluated from January 2020 to January 2022. Data were extracted from the Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network, a valid national system, by trained recorders using electronic medical records. Demographic factors, obstetric factors, and prenatal factors were obtained from patient records. Machine learning was used to identify the risk factors of birth asphyxia. Eight machine learning models were used in the study. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of each model, six metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score were measured in the test set.
resultsOf 8888 deliveries, we identified 380 women with a recorded birth asphyxia, giving a frequency of 4.3%. Random Forest Classification was found to be the best model to predict birth asphyxia with an accuracy of 0.99. The analysis of the importance of the variables showed that maternal chronic hypertension, maternal anemia, diabetes, drug addiction, gestational age, newborn weight, newborn sex, preeclampsia, placenta abruption, parity, intrauterine growth retardation, meconium amniotic fluid, mal-presentation, and delivery method were considered to be the weighted factors.
conclusionBirth asphyxia can be predicted using a machine learning model. Random Forest Classification was found to be an accurate algorithm to predict birth asphyxia. More research should be done to analyze appropriate variables and prepare big data to determine the best model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.