ArticleJournal of diabetes2023
Development and validation of risk prediction models for large for gestational age infants using logistic regression and two machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to improve the prediction of Large for Gestational Age (LGA) neonates: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Lipid metabolism-based machine learning models for predicting large for gestational age in non-diabetic pregnancies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Establishment of a risk prediction model for large-for-gestational-age infants among Chinese women with gestational diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The mediating effects of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between maternal advanced age, previous caesarean section and the risk of small- or large-for-gestational-age newborns: a multicentric prospective cohort study in southern China.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Developing and validating a predictive model of delivering large-for-gestational-age infants among women with gestational diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2024Article
- Development and validation of risk prediction models for large for gestational age infants using logistic regression and two machine learning algorithms.Journal of diabetes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge for gestational age (LGA) is one of the adverse outcomes during pregnancy that endangers the life and health of mothers and offspring. We aimed to establish prediction models for LGA at late pregnancy.
methodsData were obtained from an established Chinese pregnant women cohort of 1285 pregnant women. LGA was diagnosed as >90th percentile of birth weight distribution of Chinese corresponding to gestational age of the same-sex newborns. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were classified into three subtypes according to the indexes of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Models were established by logistic regression and decision tree/random forest algorithms, and validated by the data.
resultsA total of 139 newborns were diagnosed as LGA after birth. The area under the curve (AUC) for the training set is 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.706-0.815), and 0.748 (95% CI 0.659-0.837) for the internal validation set of the logistic regression model, which consisted of eight commonly used clinical indicators (including lipid profile) and GDM subtypes. For the prediction models established by the two machine learning algorithms, which included all the variables, the training set and the internal validation set had AUCs of 0.813 (95% CI 0.786-0.839) and 0.779 (95% CI 0.735-0.824) for the decision tree model, and 0.854 (95% CI 0.831-0.877) and 0.808 (95% CI 0.766-0.850) for the random forest model.
conclusionWe established and validated three LGA risk prediction models to screen out the pregnant women with high risk of LGA at the early stage of the third trimester, which showed good prediction power and could guide early prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.