ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Objective psychomotor laparoscopic skills evaluation using a low-cost wearable device based on accelerometry: construct and concurrent validity study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotion analysis of surgical maneuvers provides useful quantitative information for the objective evaluation of the surgeons. However, surgical simulation laboratories for laparoscopic training do not usually integrate devices that help quantify the level of skills of the surgeons due to their limited resources and the high costs of new technologies. The purpose of this study is to present the construct and concurrent validity of a low-cost motion tracking system, based on a wireless triaxial accelerometer, employed to objectively evaluate psychomotor skills of surgeons during laparoscopic training.
methodsAn accelerometry system, a wireless three-axis accelerometer with appearance of wristwatch, was placed on the dominant hand of the surgeons to register the motion during the laparoscopy practice with the EndoViS simulator, which simultaneously recorded the motion of the laparoscopic needle driver. This study included the participation of 30 surgeons (6 experts, 14 intermediates and 10 novices) who performed the task of intracorporeal knot-tying suture. Using 11 motion analysis parameters (MAPs), the performance of each participant was assessed. Subsequently, the scores of the three groups of surgeons were statistically analyzed. In addition, a validity study was conducted comparing the metrics between the accelerometry-tracking system and the EndoViS hybrid simulator.
resultsConstruct validity was achieved for 8 of the 11 metrics examined with the accelerometry system. Concurrent validity demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between the results of the accelerometry system and the EndoViS simulator in 9 of 11 parameters, showing reliability of the accelerometry system as an objective evaluation method.
conclusionThe accelerometry system was successfully validated. This method is potentially useful to complement the objective evaluation of surgeons during laparoscopic practice in training environments such as box-trainers and simulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.