ArticleScientific reports2023
Mesh shrinkage after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of mesh displacement following laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal technique: comparing mesh fixation and non-fixation in difficult inguinal hernias.Updates in surgery · 2026Trial
- Magnetic resonance imaging for visualization, segmentation and 3D reconstruction of surgical meshes in the lower abdomen: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Analysis of mesh-related factors associated with recurrence and treatment outcomes after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Reoperation for Recurrence After Groin Hernia Repair in Adolescents: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Versus Absorbable Tacks in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Assessment of mesh shrinkage using fibroblast-populated collagen matrices: a proof of concept for in vitro hernia mesh testing.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synthetic mesh is now used for inguinal hernia repair in most cases. It is well known that the indwelling mesh contracts after placement in the body, regardless of the material. The aim of this study was to develop a method for indirect measurement of the mesh area postoperatively that allows for easy comparison with the condition of the mesh immediately after surgery. X-ray-impermeable tackers were used to fix the mesh, and changes of the indwelling mesh after surgery were measured indirectly using two mesh materials. This study involved 26 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with a polypropylene or polyester mesh (13 patients each). Polypropylene showed a stronger tendency to shrink, but there was no significant difference between the materials. For both materials, some patients showed relatively strong shrinkage and others showed relatively weak shrinkage. The group with the strong shrinkage had significantly higher body mass index. The results of the present study showed that mesh surly shrinked over time and there was no adverse effect of mesh shrinkage on the patients outcomes in this population. Mesh would shrink over time regardless of the sort of mesh but it did not affect the patients outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.