Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

The Role of Psychosocial Screening in Patient Selection for Spine Surgery: A Review.

Ethan R Faye, Jacob R Ball, Emily S Mills, Jeffrey Wang, Raymond J Hah, Ram K Alluri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Does grit and self-control impact outcomes following spine surgery? Early findings from a prospective study evaluating the association between grit and self-control following minimally invasive laminectomy/microdiscectomy and anterior cervical surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ethan R FayeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jacob R BallDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA Jacob.ball@med.usc.edu.
Emily S MillsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raymond J HahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ram K AlluriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this review is to provide a brief history of previous attempts at developing patient screening tools and to further examine the definitions of these psychological concepts, relevance to clinical outcomes, and implications for spine surgeons during preoperative patient assessments.

methodsA literature review was performed by 2 independent researchers to identify original manuscripts related to spine surgery and novel psychological concepts. The history of presurgical psychology screening was also studied, and definitions of frequently utilized metrics were detailed.

resultsSeven manuscripts were identified that utilized psychological metrics for preoperative risk assessments and correlated outcomes with these scores. The metrics most frequently used in the literature included resilience, patient activation, grit, and self-efficacy. DISCUSSION: Current literature favors resilience and patient activation as important metrics for preoperative patient screening. Available studies demonstrate significant associations between these character traits and patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to investigate the roles of preoperative psychological screening to optimize patient selection in spine surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The purpose of this review is to provide clinicians with a reference for available psychosocial screening tools and their relevance to patient selection. This review also serves to guide future research directions given the importance of this topic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:

Indexed as

gritminimally invasive surgerypatient activationpsychologypsychosocial screeningresiliencespine surgery

Identifiers

PMID36889902
PMCPMC10165645
OpenAlexW4323546152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.