ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2023
Designing Biocompatible Tissue Engineered Heart Valves In Situ: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning from Biodegradable Coronary Stents: Future Directions for TPVR Biodegradable Stents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evolutions in Cardiovascular Implants-A Review of Past, Present, and Future.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Advancements and Challenges in Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves: Integrating Biomechanics, Biomaterials, and Biomimetic Design for Functional Maturity.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An intelligent nanoreservoir system promotes heart valve regeneration via ROS scavenging and immunomodulation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Individualized Selection of Valve Intervention Strategies in Aortic Disease Is Key for Better Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Hydrogels in Cardiac Surgery: Versatile Platforms for Tissue Repair, Adhesion Prevention, and Localized Therapeutics.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Materials Advances in Devices for Heart Disease Interventions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Tissue Engineering In Vitro Leaflet- and 3-Dimensional Printing-Based Implant Prototypes for Infant Mitral Valve.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- Research Progress on the Application of Natural Medicines in Biomaterial Coatings.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Extracellular Matrix Dynamics in Aortic Valve Health and Disease: Insights into Fibrocalcific Remodeling and Creation of Biomimetic Platforms.Journal of the Heart Valve SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Valvular heart disease is a globally prevalent cause of morbidity and mortality, with both congenital and acquired clinical presentations. Tissue engineered heart valves (TEHVs) have the potential to radically shift the treatment landscape for valvular disease by functioning as life-long valve replacements that overcome the current limitations of bioprosthetic and mechanical valves. TEHVs are envisioned to meet these goals by functioning as bioinstructive scaffolds that guide the in situ generation of autologous valves capable of growth, repair, and remodeling within the patient. Despite their promise, clinical translation of in situ TEHVs has proven challenging largely because of the unpredictable and patient-specific nature of the TEHV and host interaction following implantation. In light of this challenge, we propose a framework for the development and clinical translation of biocompatible TEHVs, wherein the native valvular environment actively informs the valve's design parameters and sets the benchmarks by which it is functionally evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.