Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889807›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Antiracism in leading public health universities, journals and funders: commitments, accountability and the decision-makers.

Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Ngozi A Erondu, Bakht Anwar, Ezekiel Boro, Thuy Duyen Chau, Renzo R Guinto, Lara Hollmann, Jerome Alan Mejarito, Muneera A Rasheed, Mishal Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Afifah Rahman-ShepherdSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-9275
Ngozi A EronduGlobal Institute for Disease Elimination, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0003-0268-6838
Bakht AnwarFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ezekiel BoroAction to Decolonise Global Health, Virtual Network, Global.ORCID 0000-0002-1208-2985
Thuy Duyen ChauFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Renzo R GuintoPlanetary and Global Health Program, St Luke's Medical Center College of Medicine-William H. Quasha Memorial, Quezon City, Philippines.
Lara HollmannAction to Decolonise Global Health, Virtual Network, Global.
Jerome Alan MejaritoPlanetary and Global Health Program, St Luke's Medical Center College of Medicine-William H. Quasha Memorial, Quezon City, Philippines.
Muneera A RasheedAction to Decolonise Global Health, Virtual Network, Global.ORCID 0000-0002-9064-0102
Mishal KhanFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK mishal.khan@lshtm.ac.uk.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSt. Luke's Medical Center · PHUniversity of Geneva · CHGeorgetown University · USUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo years since the murder of George Floyd, there has been unprecedented attention to racial justice by global public health organisations. Still, there is scepticism that attention alone will lead to real change.

methodsWe identified the highest-ranked 15 public health universities, academic journals and funding agencies, and used a standardised data extraction template to analyse the organisation's governance structures, leadership dynamics and public statements on antiracism since 1 May 2020.

resultsWe found that the majority of organisations (26/45) have not made any public statements in response to calls for antiracism actions, and that decision-making bodies are still lacking diversity and representation from the majority of the world's population. Of those organisations that have made public statements (19/45), we identified seven types of commitments including policy change, financial resources, education and training. Most commitments were not accompanied by accountability measures, such as setting goals or developing metrics of progress, which raises concerns about how antiracism commitments are being tracked, as well as how they can be translated into tangible action.

conclusionThe absence of any kind of public statement paired with the greater lack of commitments and accountability measures calls into question whether leading public health organisations are concretely committed to racial justice and antiracism reform.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicPublic HealthAntiracismDecision MakingHumansSocial ResponsibilityUniversitiespublic health

Identifiers

PMID36889807
PMCPMC10008334
OpenAlexW4323545428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.