Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889350›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2022

Mengying Ren, Anthony D So, Sujith J Chandy, Mirfin Mpundu, Arturo Quizhpe Peralta, Kerstin Åkerfeldt, Anna Karin Sjöblom, Otto Cars

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The 3D Value Framework for Sustainable Access to Effective Antibiotics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Strengthening Global Health Research.Global health action · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mengying RenUPPSALA UNIVERSITY, UPPSALA, SWEDEN.
Anthony D SoJOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, BALTIMORE, MD, USA.
Sujith J ChandyCHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE, VELLORE, INDIA.
Mirfin MpunduREACT AFRICA, LUSAKA, ZAMBIA.
Arturo Quizhpe PeraltaREACT LATIN AMERICA, CUENCA, ECUADOR.
Kerstin ÅkerfeldtUPPSALA UNIVERSITY, UPPSALA, SWEDEN.
Anna Karin SjöblomUPPSALA UNIVERSITY, UPPSALA, SWEDEN.
Otto CarsUPPSALA UNIVERSITY, UPPSALA, SWEDEN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Securing equitable antibiotic access as an essential component for health system resilience and pandemic preparedness requires a systems perspective. This article discusses key components that need to be coordinated and paired with adequate financing and resources to ensure antibiotic effectiveness as a global public good, which should be central while discussing a new global agreement.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPandemicsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ResistanceAntibioticsEquitable AccessHealth SystemPandemic Instrument

Identifiers

PMID36889350
PMCPMC10009365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.