Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889345›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2022

Using the International Pandemic Instrument to Revitalize the Innovation Ecosystem for Antimicrobial R&D.

Andrea Morales Caceres, Kshitij Kumar Singh, Timo Minssen, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk, Steven J Hoffman

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea Morales CaceresYORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA.
Kshitij Kumar SinghUNIVERSITY OF DELHI.
Timo MinssenUNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN, COPENHAGEN, DENMARK.
Susan Rogers Van KatwykYORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA.
Steven J HoffmanYORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA.

Funding

CIHR 149542Wellcome Trust 222422/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and increased research and development (R&D) capabilities in the most recent outline of the World Health Organization's (WHO's) international pandemic instrument signals an opportunity to reshape pharmaceutical R&D system in favour of antimicrobial product development. This article explains why the current innovation ecosystem has disadvantaged the creation of antimicrobial products for human use. It also highlights how the COVID-19 pandemic experience can inform and stimulate international cooperation to implement innovative R&D incentives to bring new, life-saving antimicrobial products to the market.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCOVID-19EcosystemHumansPandemicsResearchAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial ResistanceInnovationPandemic InstrumentPharmaceuticalsResearch and Development

Identifiers

PMID36889345
PMCPMC10009383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read5
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.