Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889344›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2022

A Pandemic Instrument Can Start Turning Collective Problems into Collective Solutions by Governing the Common-Pool Resource of Antimicrobial Effectiveness.

Isaac Weldon, Kathy Liddell, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk, Steven J Hoffman, Timo Minssen, Kevin Outterson, Stephanie Palmer, A M Viens, Jorge Viñuales

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Embed Multisectoral Governance Mechanisms in the Pandemic Instrument for One Health Action.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac WeldonYORK UNIVERSITY IN TORONTO, CANADA.
Kathy LiddellUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, CAMBRIDGE, UK.
Susan Rogers Van KatwykYORK UNIVERSITY IN TORONTO, CANADA.
Steven J HoffmanYORK UNIVERSITY IN TORONTO, CANADA.
Timo MinssenUNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN, COPENHAGEN, DENMARK.
Kevin OuttersonCARB-X,BOSTON, MA, USA.
Stephanie PalmerUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, CAMBRIDGE, UK.
A M ViensYORK UNIVERSITY IN TORONTO, CANADA.
Jorge ViñualesUNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, CAMBRIDGE, UK.

Funding

CIHR 149542Wellcome Trust 222422/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the complex challenge of global antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a pandemic treaty should include mechanisms that 1) equitably address the access gap for antimicrobials, diagnostic technologies, and alternative therapies; 2) equitably conserve antimicrobials to sustain effectiveness and access across time and space; 3) equitably finance the investment, discovery, development, and distribution of new technologies; and 4) equitably finance and establish greater upstream and midstream infection prevention measures globally. Biodiversity, climate, and nuclear governance offer lessons for addressing these challenges.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPandemicsHumansInternational CooperationAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial ResistanceCollective ActionCommon-Pool ResourcesEquityGovernance

Identifiers

PMID36889344
PMCPMC10009384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.