Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36889057›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2023

Multi-Institutional Study of Pathologist Reading of the Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Combined Positive Score Immunohistochemistry Assay for Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

Aileen I Fernandez, Charles J Robbins, Patricia Gaule, Diana Agostini-Vulaj, Robert A Anders, Andrew M Bellizzi, Wei Chen, Zongming Eric Chen, Purva Gopal, Lei Zhao and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Promising Early Signal?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Aileen I FernandezDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Charles J RobbinsDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Patricia GauleDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Diana Agostini-VulajDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Robert A AndersDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Andrew M BellizziDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Wei ChenDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Zongming Eric ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Purva GopalDepartment of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Lei ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mikhail LisovskyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Xiuli LiuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jinru ShiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Huamin WangDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Zhaohai YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Leena McCannOncology Research and Development, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
Yvonne G ChanOncology Research and Development, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
Jodi WeidlerMedical and Scientific Affairs and Strategy, Oncology, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
Michael BatesMedical and Scientific Affairs and Strategy, Oncology, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California.
Xuchen ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
David L RimmDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: david.rimm@yale.edu.
Yale University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USMayo Clinic · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID L RIMM · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Yale SPORE in Lung Cancer (YSILC): The Biology and Personalized Treatment of Lung CancerP50CA196530 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2015 to 2026
$31.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001864 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$9.9M
Clinical Significance of Pancreatic Cancer Differentiation and DedifferentiationR01CA195651 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WANG, HUAMIN · 2015 to 2021
$1.8M
Novel Signaling Pathways Regulating Pancreatic Cancer PathogenesisR01CA196941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WANG, HUAMIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001864NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS P50 CA196530NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195651NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been controversial since its introduction. The methods of assessment and the range of assays and platforms contribute to confusion. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of PD-L1 IHC is the combined positive score (CPS) method of interpretation of IHC results. Although the CPS method is prescribed for more indications than any other PD-L1 scoring system, its reproducibility has never been rigorously assessed. In this study, we collected a series of 108 gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer cases, stained them using the Food and Drug Administration-approved 22C3 assay, scanned them, and then circulated them to 14 pathologists at 13 institutions for the assessment of interpretative concordance for the CPS system. We found that higher cut points (10 or 20) performed better than a CPS of <1 or >1. We used the Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests algorithm to assess how the CPS system might perform in the real-world setting and found that the cut points of <1 or >1 showed an overall percent agreement of only 30% among the pathologist raters, with a plateau occurring at 8 raters. The raters performed better at higher cut points. However, the best cut point of <20 versus that of >20 was still disappointing, with a plateau at an overall percent agreement of 70% (at 7 raters). Although there is no ground truth for CPS, we compared the score with quantitative messenger RNA measurement and showed no relationship between the score (at any cut point) and messenger RNA amount. In summary, we showed that CPS shows high subjective variability among pathologist readers and is likely to perform poorly in the real-world setting. This system may be the root cause of the poor specificity and relatively low predictive value of IHC companion diagnostic tests for PD-1 axis therapies that use the CPS system.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsApoptosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorEsophagogastric JunctionHumansImmunohistochemistryLigandsPathologistsReproducibility of ResultsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorLigandsclosed-system RT-qPCRCPSgastric cancerGEJimmunohistochemistryPD-L1RNA

Identifiers

PMID36889057
PMCPMC10198879
OpenAlexW4320487084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.