Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36888889›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

"Are we there yet?" Ten persistent hazards and inefficiencies with the use of medication administration technology from the perspective of practicing nurses.

Teresa Taft, Elizabeth Anne Rudd, Iona Thraen, Sadaf Kazi, Zoe M Pruitt, Christopher W Bonk, Deanna-Nicole Busog, Ella Franklin, Aaron Z Hettinger, Raj M Ratwani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative and qualitative methods advance the science of clinical workflow research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Teresa TaftDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9158-7323
Elizabeth Anne RuddDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Iona ThraenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sadaf KaziNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-6989
Zoe M PruittNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Christopher W BonkNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4670-2107
Deanna-Nicole BusogNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Ella FranklinNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Aaron Z HettingerNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Raj M RatwaniNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Charlene R WeirDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-2860

Funding

PA-20-070 Improving Medication Safety and Nursing Workflow during COVID Through eMAR RedesignR01HS025136 · AHRQ · MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HETTINGER, AARON ZACHARY, RATWANI, RAJ M · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) Characterize persistent hazards and inefficiencies in inpatient medication administration; (2) Explore cognitive attributes of medication administration tasks; and (3) Discuss strategies to reduce medication administration technology-related hazards. MATERIALS AND

methodsInterviews were conducted with 32 nurses practicing at 2 urban, eastern and western US health systems. Qualitative analysis using inductive and deductive coding included consensus discussion, iterative review, and coding structure revision. We abstracted hazards and inefficiencies through the lens of risks to patient safety and the cognitive perception-action cycle (PAC).

resultsPersistent safety hazards and inefficiencies related to MAT organized around the PAC cycle included: (1) Compatibility constraints create information silos; (2) Missing action cues; (3) Intermittent communication flow between safety monitoring systems and nurses; (4) Occlusion of important alerts by other, less helpful alerts; (5) Dispersed information: Information required for tasks is not collocated; (6) Inconsistent data organization: Mismatch of the display and the user's mental model; (7) Hidden medication administration technologies (MAT) limitations: Inaccurate beliefs about MAT functionality contribute to overreliance on the technology; (8) Software rigidity causes workarounds; (9) Cumbersome dependencies between technology and the physical environment; and (10) Technology breakdowns require adaptive actions. DISCUSSION: Errors might persist in medication administration despite successful Bar Code Medication Administration and Electronic Medication Administration Record deployment for reducing errors. Opportunities to improve MAT require a deeper understanding of high-level reasoning in medication administration, including control over the information space, collaboration tools, and decision support.

conclusionFuture medication administration technology should consider a deeper understanding of nursing knowledge work for medication administration.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPatient SafetyCommunicationElectronic Data ProcessingHumansMedication Systems, HospitalPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsBCMAcognitive support systemshealth information technology designmedication administration recordpatient safetyperception-action cycle

Identifiers

PMID36888889
PMCPMC10114056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.