ArticleFamily medicine2023
Preparing for the End of Life: Medical Students Completing Their Own Advance Directives Described Increased Empathy for Patients.
Article in Family medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enhancing emotional intelligence in medical education: a systematic review of interventions.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Spirituality in Serious Illness Education: A Narrative Review of Medical School Curricula From 2000 to 2024.The Permanente journal · 2025Review
- Self-Perceived Competencies and Attitudes on Palliative Care in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Teaching empathy and compassion to healthcare providers in palliative care: a scoping review.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Review
- Stories Are the Heart of Family Medicine.Family medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFamily medicine offers the opportunity to integrate advance care planning into routine primary care, connecting relationship-centered orientation with thoughtful action before a terminal diagnosis. However, physicians are undertrained in end-of-life counseling and care. To address this educational gap, we had clerkship students complete their own advance directives and submit a written reflection about the experience. The aim of this study was to learn about how students report on the value of completing their own advance directives, according to their written reflections. We hypothesized that self-described empathy, previously defined as understanding patients' emotions and communicating that understanding back to patients, would increase, as reported by students in their reflections.
methodsWe analyzed 548 written reflections over 3 academic years using a qualitative content analysis approach. An iterative process included open coding, building of themes, and verification with the text by four professionally diverse researchers.
resultsAfter completing their own advance directives, students reported increased empathy for patients facing end-of-life decisions and discussed the intention to change their future clinical practice regarding helping patients plan for the end of life.
conclusionsUsing experiential empathy, an approach to teaching and cultivating empathy in which the participants experience the topic first-hand, we directed medical students to consider their own end-of-life wishes. Upon reflection, many noted this process changed their attitudes and clinical approaches to patients' death. This learning experience could be one meaningful component of a longitudinal and comprehensive curriculum to prepare medical school graduates to help patients plan for and face the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.