Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36888621›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Detection of malignancy in whole slide images of endometrial cancer biopsies using artificial intelligence.

Christina Fell, Mahnaz Mohammadi, David Morrison, Ognjen Arandjelović, Sheeba Syed, Prakash Konanahalli, Sarah Bell, Gareth Bryson, David J Harrison, David Harris-Birtill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christina FellSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0590-4132
Mahnaz MohammadiSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3109-4324
David MorrisonSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5502-9773
Ognjen ArandjelovićSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Sheeba SyedPathology Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Prakash KonanahalliPathology Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Sarah BellPathology Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Gareth BrysonPathology Department, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
David J HarrisonSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9041-9988
David Harris-BirtillSchool of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we use artificial intelligence (AI) to categorise endometrial biopsy whole slide images (WSI) from digital pathology as either "malignant", "other or benign" or "insufficient". An endometrial biopsy is a key step in diagnosis of endometrial cancer, biopsies are viewed and diagnosed by pathologists. Pathology is increasingly digitised, with slides viewed as images on screens rather than through the lens of a microscope. The availability of these images is driving automation via the application of AI. A model that classifies slides in the manner proposed would allow prioritisation of these slides for pathologist review and hence reduce time to diagnosis for patients with cancer. Previous studies using AI on endometrial biopsies have examined slightly different tasks, for example using images alongside genomic data to differentiate between cancer subtypes. We took 2909 slides with "malignant" and "other or benign" areas annotated by pathologists. A fully supervised convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to calculate the probability of a patch from the slide being "malignant" or "other or benign". Heatmaps of all the patches on each slide were then produced to show malignant areas. These heatmaps were used to train a slide classification model to give the final slide categorisation as either "malignant", "other or benign" or "insufficient". The final model was able to accurately classify 90% of all slides correctly and 97% of slides in the malignant class; this accuracy is good enough to allow prioritisation of pathologists' workload.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndometrial NeoplasmsBiopsyFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36888621
PMCPMC9994759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.