Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36888543›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2023

Drug Delivery Approaches to Improve Tendon Healing.

Emmanuela Adjei-Sowah, Danielle S W Benoit, Alayna E Loiselle

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies Supporting the Role of Polydeoxyribonucleotide in the Treatment of Tendon Disorders.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) empowering tendon regenerative therapies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuela Adjei-SowahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0219-043X
Danielle S W BenoitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Alayna E LoiselleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
Tendon TRAP: Targeted Therapeutic Delivery to Enhance Tendon HealingR21AR081063 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENOIT, DANIELLE S., LOISELLE, ALAYNA · 2022 to 2023
$373k
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) Mass SpectrometerS10OD030302 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NILSSON, BRADLEY L. · 2021 to 2021
$304k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR081063NIH HHS S10 OD030302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendon injuries disrupt the transmission of forces from muscle to bone, leading to chronic pain, disability, and a large socioeconomic burden. Tendon injuries are prevalent; there are over 300,000 tendon repair procedures a year in the United States to address acute trauma or chronic tendinopathy. Successful restoration of function after tendon injury remains challenging clinically. Despite improvements in surgical and physical therapy techniques, the high complication rate of tendon repair procedures motivates the use of therapeutic interventions to augment healing. While many biological and tissue engineering approaches have attempted to promote scarless tendon healing, there is currently no standard clinical treatment to improve tendon healing. Moreover, the limited efficacy of systemic delivery of several promising therapeutic candidates highlights the need for tendon-specific drug delivery approaches to facilitate translation. This review article will synthesize the current state-of-the-art methods that have been used for tendon-targeted delivery through both systemic and local treatments, highlight emerging technologies used for tissue-specific drug delivery in other tissue systems, and outline future challenges and opportunities to enhance tendon healing through targeted drug delivery.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesTendon InjuriesHumansTendonsTissue EngineeringWound Healingbiomaterialsdrug deliverynanoparticlestendon injury

Identifiers

PMID36888543
PMCPMC10442691
OpenAlexW4323535698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.