ArticleAnatomy and embryology1987
Observations on the development of cerebellar afferents in Xenopus laevis.
Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Embryonic stages in cerebellar afferent development.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2015Review
- Observations on the development of ascending spinal pathways in the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis.Anatomy and embryology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of cerebellar afferents has been studied in the clawed toad, Xenopus laevis, from stage 46 to 64, with the horseradish peroxidase retrograde tracer technique. Already in stage 48 tadpoles, i.e. before the formation of the limbs, a distinct set of cerebellar afferents was found. Vestibulocerebellar (mainly arising bilaterally in the nucleus vestibularis caudalis) and contralateral olivo-cerebellar projections dominate. Secondary trigeminocerebellar (from the descending nucleus of the trigeminal nerve) and reticulocerebellar connections were also found. At stage 50, spinocerebellar projections appear originating from cervical and lower thoracic/upper lumbar levels. The cells of origin of the spinocerebellar projection can be roughly divided in two neuronal types: ipsilaterally projecting large cells, which show a marked resemblance to primary motoneurones ('spinal border cells') and smaller contralaterally projecting neurons. Primary spinocerebellar projections from spinal ganglion cells could not be demonstrated. At stage 50, a possible anuran homologue of the mammalian nucleus prepositus hypoglossi was found to project to the cerebellum. In only one of the experiments labeled neurons were found in the contralateral mesencephalic tegmentum. At none of the studied stages a raphecerebellar projection could be demonstrated. It appears that already early in cerebellar development, before the formation of the limbs, most of the cerebellar afferents as found in adult Xenopus laevis are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.