Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36884270›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

A Data Transformation Methodology to Create Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Health Data: Software Design, Development, and Evaluation Study.

A Anil Sinaci, Mert Gencturk, Huseyin Alper Teoman, Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen, Celia Alvarez-Romero, Alicia Martinez-Garcia, Beatriz Poblador-Plou, Jonás Carmona-Pírez, Matthias Löbe, Carlos Luis Parra-Calderon

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A Anil SinaciSoftware Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation (SRDC), Cankaya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-3382
Mert GencturkSoftware Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation (SRDC), Cankaya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2697-5722
Huseyin Alper TeomanSoftware Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation (SRDC), Cankaya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2391-4281
Gokce Banu Laleci ErturkmenSoftware Research & Development and Consultancy Corporation (SRDC), Cankaya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-3849
Celia Alvarez-RomeroGroup of Computational Health Informatics, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Spanish National Research Council, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8647-9515
Alicia Martinez-GarciaGroup of Computational Health Informatics, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Spanish National Research Council, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5614-7747
Beatriz Poblador-PlouEpiChron Research Group, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5119-5093
Jonás Carmona-PírezEpiChron Research Group, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-8803
Matthias LöbeInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2344-0426
Carlos Luis Parra-CalderonGroup of Computational Health Informatics, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Spanish National Research Council, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2609-575X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSharing health data is challenging because of several technical, ethical, and regulatory issues. The Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) guiding principles have been conceptualized to enable data interoperability. Many studies provide implementation guidelines, assessment metrics, and software to achieve FAIR-compliant data, especially for health data sets. Health Level 7 (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) is a health data content modeling and exchange standard.

objectiveOur goal was to devise a new methodology to extract, transform, and load existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR repositories in line with FAIR principles, develop a Data Curation Tool to implement the methodology, and evaluate it on health data sets from 2 different but complementary institutions. We aimed to increase the level of compliance with FAIR principles of existing health data sets through standardization and facilitate health data sharing by eliminating the associated technical barriers.

methodsOur approach automatically processes the capabilities of a given FHIR end point and directs the user while configuring mappings according to the rules enforced by FHIR profile definitions. Code system mappings can be configured for terminology translations through automatic use of FHIR resources. The validity of the created FHIR resources can be automatically checked, and the software does not allow invalid resources to be persisted. At each stage of our data transformation methodology, we used particular FHIR-based techniques so that the resulting data set could be evaluated as FAIR. We performed a data-centric evaluation of our methodology on health data sets from 2 different institutions.

resultsThrough an intuitive graphical user interface, users are prompted to configure the mappings into FHIR resource types with respect to the restrictions of selected profiles. Once the mappings are developed, our approach can syntactically and semantically transform existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR without loss of data utility according to our privacy-concerned criteria. In addition to the mapped resource types, behind the scenes, we create additional FHIR resources to satisfy several FAIR criteria. According to the data maturity indicators and evaluation methods of the FAIR Data Maturity Model, we achieved the maximum level (level 5) for being Findable, Accessible, and Interoperable and level 3 for being Reusable.

conclusionsWe developed and extensively evaluated our data transformation approach to unlock the value of existing health data residing in disparate data silos to make them available for sharing according to the FAIR principles. We showed that our method can successfully transform existing health data sets into HL7 FHIR without loss of data utility, and the result is FAIR in terms of the FAIR Data Maturity Model. We support institutional migration to HL7 FHIR, which not only leads to FAIR data sharing but also eases the integration with different research networks.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsSoftwareHealth Level SevenHumansInformation DisseminationSoftware DesignFAIR principlesFindable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable principleshealth data sharinghealth data transformationHealth Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability ResourcesHL7 FHIRsecondary use

Identifiers

PMID36884270
PMCPMC10034606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read7
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.