Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36884252›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Predicting the Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Extremely Preterm Newborns Using a Multimodal Prognostic Model Including Brain Function Information.

Laura Routier, Laurent Querne, Ghida Ghostine-Ramadan, Julie Boulesteix, Solène Graïc, Sandrine Mony, Fabrice Wallois, Emilie Bourel-Ponchel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Persisting Value of Autopsies on Extremely Preterm Infants in the 21Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura RoutierINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Laurent QuerneINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Ghida Ghostine-RamadanINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Julie BoulesteixINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Solène GraïcINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Sandrine MonyINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Fabrice WalloisINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Emilie Bourel-PonchelINSERM UMR 1105, Research Group on Multimodal Analysis of Brain Function, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens Cedex, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Early assessment of the prognosis of preterm newborns is crucial for accurately informing parents and making treatment decisions. The currently available prognostic models rarely incorporate functional brain information from conventional electroencephalography (cEEG). Objective: To examine the performance of a multimodal model combining (1) brain function information with (2) brain structure information (cranial ultrasonography), and (3) perinatal and (4) postnatal risk factors for the prediction of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in extremely preterm infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: Preterm newborns (23-28 weeks' gestational age) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at Amiens-Picardie University Hospital were retrospectively included (January 1, 2013, to January 1, 2018). Risk factors from the 4 categories were collected during the first 2 weeks post delivery. Neurodevelopmental impairment was assessed at age 2 years with the Denver Developmental Screening Test II. No or moderate NDI was considered a favorable outcome. Death or severe NDI was considered an adverse outcome. Data analysis was performed from August 26, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: After the selection of variables significantly associated with outcome, 4 unimodal prognostic models (considering each category of variable independently) and 1 multimodal model (considering all variables simultaneously) were developed. After a multivariate analysis for models built with several variables, decision-tree algorithms were run on each model. The areas under the curve for decision-tree classifications of adverse vs favorable outcomes were determined for each model, compared using bootstrap tests, and corrected for type I errors. Results: A total of 109 newborns (58 [53.2% male]) born at a mean (SD) gestational age of 26.3 (1.1) weeks were included. Among them, 52 (47.7%) had a favorable outcome at age 2 years. The multimodal model area under the curve (91.7%; 95% CI, 86.4%-97.0%) was significantly higher than those of the unimodal models (P < .003): perinatal model (80.6%; 95% CI, 72.5%-88.7%), postnatal model (81.0%; 95% CI, 72.6%-89.4%), brain structure model (cranial ultrasonography) (76.6%; 95% CI, 67.8%-85.3%), and brain function model (cEEG) (78.8%; 95% CI, 69.9%-87.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study of preterm newborns, the inclusion of brain information in a multimodal model was associated with significant improvement in the outcome prediction, which may have resulted from the complementarity of the risk factors and reflected the complexity of the mechanisms that interfered with brain maturation and led to death or NDI.

Indexed as

BrainInfant, Extremely PrematureChild, PreschoolFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36884252
PMCPMC9996404
OpenAlexW4323534538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.