Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36884232›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2023

Prevalence of Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Alexandra Roddy Mitchell, Hannah Gordon, Anthea Lindquist, Susan P Walker, Caroline S E Homer, Anna Middleton, Catherine A Cluver, Stephen Tong, Roxanne Hastie

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra Roddy MitchellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Hannah GordonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Anthea LindquistDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Susan P WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline S E HomerMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anna MiddletonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Catherine A CluverDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Stephen TongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Roxanne HastieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Women who experience depression during or within a year of pregnancy are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Although those living in low- and middle-income countries are thought to be at increased risk of perinatal depression, the true prevalence remains unclear. Objective: To determine the prevalence of depression among individuals living in low- and middle-income countries during pregnancy and up 1 year post partum. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception until April 15, 2021. Study Selection: Studies were included that reported the prevalence of depression using a validated method during pregnancy or up to 12 months post partum in countries defined by the World Bank as low, lower-middle, and upper-middle income. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed studies for bias. Prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Subgroup analyses were performed among women who were considered at increased risk of developing perinatal depression. Main Outcomes and Measures: Point prevalence of perinatal depression was the main outcome measured as percentage point estimates with corresponding 95% CIs. Results: The search identified 8106 studies, of which data were extracted from 589 eligible studies reporting outcomes of 616 708 women from 51 countries. The pooled prevalence of perinatal depression across all studies was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.7%-25.6%). The prevalence of perinatal depression varied slightly by country income status. The highest prevalence was found in lower-middle-income countries, with a pooled prevalence of 25.5% (95% CI, 23.8%-27.1%; 197 studies from 23 countries including 212 103 individuals). In upper-middle-income countries, the pooled prevalence was 24.7% (95% CI, 23.6%-25.9%; 344 studies from 21 countries including 364 103 individuals) and in low-income countries, the pooled prevalence was 20.7% (95% CI, 18.4%-23.0%; 50 studies from 7 countries including 40 502 individuals). The East Asia and the Pacific region had the lowest prevalence of perinatal depression at 21.4% (95% CI, 19.8%-23.1%) and was significantly increased in the Middle East and North Africa at 31.5% (95% CI, 26.9%-36.2%; between-group comparison: P < .001). In subgroup analyses, the highest prevalence of perinatal depression was found among women who experienced intimate partner violence, at 38.9% (95% CI, 34.1%-43.6%). revalence of depression was also high among women with HIV (35.1% [95% CI, 29.6%-40.6%]) and those who had experienced a natural disaster (34.8% [95% CI, 29.4%-40.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found that depression was common in low- and middle-income countries, affecting 1 in 4 perinatal women. Accurate estimates of the prevalence of perinatal depression in low- and middle-income countries are essential in informing policy, allocating scarce resources, and directing further research to improve outcomes for women, infants, and families.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderDeveloping CountriesDepressionFemaleHumansIncomeInfantPregnancyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID36884232
PMCPMC9996459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.