Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36884066›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Photodynamic therapy in Germany-Quo vadis?]

L Pauleikhoff, K Rothaus, F Groß-Bölting, D Böhringer, J Lübke, H Agostini, C Lange, Retina.Net CCS Register Studiengruppe

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Landscape of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Germany: Retina.net CSC Registry Report Number 1.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L PauleikhoffKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-8391
K RothausAugenzentrum am St. Franzikus Hospital, Münster, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Münster, Deutschland.
F Groß-BöltingAugenzentrum am St. Franzikus Hospital, Münster, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Münster, Deutschland.
D BöhringerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
J LübkeKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
H AgostiniKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
C LangeKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland. clemens.lange@augen-franziskus.de.
Retina.Net CCS Register Studiengruppe
University Medical Center Freiburg · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft PA 4282/1-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) was originally approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and secondary choroidal neovascularization in myopia (mCNV). In addition, it is used as an off-label treatment in patients with choroidal hemangioma, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

objectiveTo track the development of PDT treatment numbers in Germany between 2006 and 2021 and to investigate the composition of the therapeutic indications.

methodsIn this retrospective study the quality reports of German hospitals were evaluated in the period from 2006 to 2019 and the number of PDTs performed was recorded. In addition, the range of indications for PDT was determined exemplarily for the Eye Center at Medical Center, University of Freiburg and the Eye Center at St. Franziskus Hospital in Münster between 2006 and 2021. Finally, the estimated prevalence of CSC and an estimate of cases requiring treatment were used to calculate the number of patients in need of PDT treatment in Germany.

resultsThe number of PDTs performed in Germany decreased from 1072 in 2006 to 202 in 2019. While PDT was used in 86% of cases in patients with nAMD and in 7% of cases with mCNV in 2006, it was mainly performed in patients with CSC (70%) and choroidal hemangiomas (21%) from 2016 to 2021. With an estimated incidence of CSC of 1:10,000 and assuming that 16% of patients develop chronic CCS requiring treatment, approximately 1330 PDTs would need to be performed per year in Germany for patients with newly diagnosed chronic CSC alone.

conclusionThe decreasing numbers of PDT treatment performed in Germany is mainly due to a change to intravitreal injections as the preferred treatment for nAMD and mCNV. As PDT is currently the recommended treatment of choice for chronic CSC, an underprovision of PDT in Germany can be assumed. To enable an appropriate treatment for patients, a reliable verteporfin production, a simplified approval process by health insurance companies and a close cooperation between ophthalmologists in private practice and larger centers are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Choroidal NeovascularizationChoroid NeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyHumansPhotosensitizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesVerteporfinPhotosensitizing AgentsVerteporfinCentral serous chorioretinopathyChoroidal haemangiomaMyopic choroidal neovascularisationNeovascular age-related macular degenerationPolypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Identifiers

PMID36884066
OpenAlexW4323533045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.