ArticlePediatric radiology2023
An automatic and accurate deep learning-based neuroimaging pipeline for the neonatal brain.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning techniques for predicting neurodevelopmental impairments in premature infants: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Neonatal Brain: Modalities, Scoring Systems, and Clinical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Image quality evaluation of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging using a deep learning reconstruction algorithm: A quantitative and multireader study using variable denoising levels at 3 tesla.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2026Article
- Deep infant brain segmentation from multi-contrast MRI.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers · 2025Article
- VINNA for neonates: Orientation independence through latent augmentations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Transforming neonatal care with artificial intelligence: challenges, ethical consideration, and opportunities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of neonatal brain tissues and structures is crucial for studying normal development and diagnosing early neurodevelopmental disorders. However, there is a lack of an end-to-end pipeline for automated segmentation and imaging analysis of the normal and abnormal neonatal brain.
objectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning-based pipeline for neonatal brain segmentation and analysis of structural magnetic resonance images (MRI). MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo cohorts were enrolled in the study, including cohort 1 (582 neonates from the developing Human Connectome Project) and cohort 2 (37 neonates imaged using a 3.0-tesla MRI scanner in our hospital).We developed a deep leaning-based architecture capable of brain segmentation into 9 tissues and 87 structures. Then, extensive validations were performed for accuracy, effectiveness, robustness and generality of the pipeline. Furthermore, regional volume and cortical surface estimation were measured through in-house bash script implemented in FSL (Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain Software Library) to ensure reliability of the pipeline. Dice similarity score (DSC), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (H95) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the quality of our pipeline. Finally, we finetuned and validated our pipeline on 2-dimensional thick-slice MRI in cohorts 1 and 2.
resultsThe deep learning-based model showed excellent performance for neonatal brain tissue and structural segmentation, with the best DSC and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (H
conclusionsWe propose an automatic, accurate, stable and reliable pipeline for neonatal brain segmentation and analysis from thin and thick structural MRI. The external validation showed very good reproducibility of the pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.