ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2023
Validation of Ligand Tetramers for the Detection of Antigen-Specific Lymphocytes.
Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- T cell immunomonitoring: a comparative analysis of traditional and novel methods to quantify and characterize human antigen-specific T cells.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Response of B Cells Specific for Polyomavirus-Derived Oncoprotein Is Predictive of Merkel Cell Carcinoma Tumor Control.Cancer immunology research · 2026Article
- Detection and Validation of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Specific, Cross-Reactive, and Heteroclitic B Cells Induced by a Combination Vaccine Adjuvant.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2025Article
- Identification of antibodies induced by immunization with the syphilis vaccine candidate Tp0751.Vaccine · 2025Article
- CD39 Is Expressed on Functional Effector and Tissue-resident Memory CD8+ T Cells.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2024Article
- Production and use of antigen tetramers to study antigen-specific B cells.Nature protocols · 2024Review
- Isolation of Rare Antigen-Specific Memory B Cells via Antigen Tetramers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of Ag-specific lymphocytes has been a key advancement in immunology over the past few decades. The development of multimerized probes containing Ags, peptide:MHC complexes, or other ligands was one innovation allowing the direct study of Ag-specific lymphocytes by flow cytometry. Although these types of study are now common and performed by thousands of laboratories, quality control and assessment of probe quality are often minimal. In fact, many of these types of probe are made in-house, and protocols vary between laboratories. Although peptide:MHC multimers can often be obtained from commercial sources or core facilities, few such services exist for Ag multimers. To ensure high quality and consistency with ligand probes, we have developed an easy and robust multiplexed approach using commercially available beads able to bind Abs specific for the ligand of interest. Using this assay, we have sensitively assessed the performance of peptide:MHC and Ag tetramers and have found considerable batch-to-batch variability in performance and stability over time more easily than using murine or human cell-based assays. This bead-based assay can also reveal common production errors such as miscalculation of Ag concentration. This work could set the stage for the development of standardized assays for all commonly used ligand probes to limit laboratory-to-laboratory technical variation and experimental failure caused by probe underperformance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.