Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883741›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

The sensorimotor system modulates muscular co-contraction relative to visuomotor feedback responses to regulate movement variability.

Jan A Calalo, Adam M Roth, Rakshith Lokesh, Seth R Sullivan, Jeremy D Wong, Jennifer A Semrau, Joshua G A Cashaback

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan A CalaloDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8066-9745
Adam M RothDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.
Rakshith LokeshDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8592-5392
Seth R SullivanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.
Jeremy D WongDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer A SemrauKinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2812-7789
Joshua G A CashabackDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8642-6648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The naturally occurring variability in our movements often poses a significant challenge when attempting to produce precise and accurate actions, which is readily evident when playing a game of darts. Two differing, yet potentially complementary, control strategies that the sensorimotor system may use to regulate movement variability are impedance control and feedback control. Greater muscular co-contraction leads to greater impedance that acts to stabilize the hand, while visuomotor feedback responses can be used to rapidly correct for unexpected deviations when reaching toward a target. Here, we examined the independent roles and potential interplay of impedance control and visuomotor feedback control when regulating movement variability. Participants were instructed to perform a precise reaching task by moving a cursor through a narrow visual channel. We manipulated cursor feedback by visually amplifying movement variability and/or delaying the visual feedback of the cursor. We found that participants decreased movement variability by increasing muscular co-contraction, aligned with an impedance control strategy. Participants displayed visuomotor feedback responses during the task but, unexpectedly, there was no modulation between conditions. However, we did find a relationship between muscular co-contraction and visuomotor feedback responses, suggesting that participants modulated impedance control relative to feedback control. Taken together, our results highlight that the sensorimotor system modulates muscular co-contraction, relative to visuomotor feedback responses, to regulate movement variability and produce accurate actions.

Indexed as

MovementPsychomotor PerformanceAdaptation, PhysiologicalFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHandHumansVisual Perceptionco-contractionfeedbackimpedancemovement variabilityvisuomotor

Identifiers

PMID36883741
PMCPMC10069957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.