Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883313›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2023

Interactions between insect vectors and plant pathogens span the parasitism-mutualism continuum.

Ma Francesca M Santiago, Kayla C King, Georgia C Drew

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Horizons of the Future: Preparedness and Response.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Editorial: Parasitism: the good, the bad and the ugly.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ma Francesca M SantiagoDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6819-074X
Kayla C KingDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
Georgia C DrewDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-1821
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural crops infected with vector-borne pathogens can suffer severe negative consequences, but the extent to which phytopathogens affect the fitness of their vector hosts remains unclear. Evolutionary theory predicts that selection on vector-borne pathogens will favour low virulence or mutualistic phenotypes in the vector, traits facilitating effective transmission between plant hosts. Here, we use a multivariate meta-analytic approach on 115 effect sizes across 34 unique plant-vector-pathogen systems to quantify the overall effect of phytopathogens on vector host fitness. In support of theoretical models, we report that phytopathogens overall have a neutral fitness effect on vector hosts. However, the range of fitness outcomes is diverse and span the parasitism-mutualism continuum. We found no evidence that various transmission strategies, or direct effects and indirect (plant-mediated) effects, of phytopathogens have divergent fitness outcomes for the vector. Our finding emphasizes diversity in tripartite interactions and the necessity for pathosystem-specific approaches to vector control.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsSymbiosisAnimalsBiological EvolutionPhenotypeVirulencemulti-trophic interactionsparasitism–mutualism continuumphytopathogensymbiosis continuumvector-bornevector–pathogen interactions

Identifiers

PMID36883313
PMCPMC9993222
OpenAlexW4323534427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.