Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883278›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

It's a small world for parasites: evidence supporting the North American invasion of European

Maria A Santa, Gerald Umhang, Claudia Klein, Danielle M Grant, Kathreen E Ruckstuhl, Marco Musiani, John S Gilleard, Alessandro Massolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Genetic diversity and genotyping ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Review
  7. Molecular phylogenetic analysis ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria A SantaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2512-1573
Gerald UmhangNancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, National Reference Laboratory for Echinococcus spp., Wildlife Surveillance and Eco-epidemiology Unit, ANSES, Technopôle Agricole et Vétérinaire, Malzéville, France.
Claudia KleinDepartment of Clinical and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Danielle M GrantDepartment of Clinical and Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kathreen E RuckstuhlDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marco MusianiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
John S GilleardDepartment of Comparative Biology & Experimental Medicine, Host-Parasite Interactions (HPI) program, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alessandro MassoloEthology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-4281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

EchinococcosisEchinococcus multilocularisParasitesAnimalsCanadaFoxesHumansallochthonous strainsEchinococcus multilocularisgenetic characterizationNorth Americaparasite invasion

Identifiers

PMID36883278
PMCPMC9993045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.