Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883168›Full record

ReviewJournal of innovation and entrepreneurship2023

Hack your organizational innovation: literature review and integrative model for running hackathons.

Ben Heller, Atar Amir, Roy Waxman, Yossi Maaravi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben Heller *Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.
Atar AmirThe Adelson School of Entrepreneurship, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.
Roy WaxmanThe Adelson School of Entrepreneurship, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.
Yossi Maaravi *The Adelson School of Entrepreneurship, Reichman University (IDC), Herzliya, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5490-4513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the existing literature on the hackathon phenomenon to offer scholars a common ground for future research and managers and practitioners research-based guidelines on best planning and running a hackathon. A review of the most relevant literature on hackathons was conducted to serve as the research basis for our integrative model and guidelines. This article synthesizes the research on hackathons to offer comprehensible guidelines for practitioners while also providing questions for future hackathon researchers. We differentiate between the different design characteristics of hackathons while noting their advantages and disadvantages, discuss tools and methodologies for successful hackathon setup and execution step-by-step, and provide recommendations to encourage project continuity.

Indexed as

CreativityHackathonIdeationInnovationOrganizational Innovation

Identifiers

PMID36883168
PMCPMC9983543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.