ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2019
Inferring Cortical Connectivity from ECoG Signals Using Graph Signal Processing.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficient coherence inference on complex time-frequency coefficients using a general linear model.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A novel method to characterize connectivity between sites in the cerebral cortex of primates is proposed in this paper. Connectivity graphs for two macaque monkeys are inferred from Electrocorticographic (ECoG) activity recorded while the animals were alert. The locations of ECoG electrodes are considered as nodes of the graph, the coefficients of the auto-regressive (AR) representation of the signals measured at each node are considered as the signal on the graph and the connectivity strengths between the nodes are considered as the edges of the graph. Maximization of the graph smoothness defined from the Laplacian quadratic form is used to infer the connectivity map (adjacency matrix of the graph). The cortical evoked potential (CEP) map was obtained by stimulating different electrodes and recording the evoked potentials at the other electrodes. The maps obtained by the graph inference and the traditional method of spectral coherence are compared with the CEP map. The results show that the proposed method provides a description of cortical connectivity that is more similar to the stimulation-based measures than spectral coherence. The results are also tested by the surrogate map analysis in which the CEP map is randomly permuted and the distribution of the errors is obtained. It is shown that error between the two maps is comfortably outside the surrogate map error distribution. This indicates that the similarity between the map calculated by the graph inference and the CEP map is statistically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.