Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883073›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Post Radical Prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction. A Single Centre Experience.

Konstantinos Pikramenos, Maria Zachou, Dimitrios Papadopoulos, Athanasios Papatsoris, Ioannis Varkarakis, Iraklis Mitsogiannis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Konstantinos PikramenosSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens, GRC.
Maria ZachouGastroenterology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Dimitrios PapadopoulosAnaesthesiology, Evgenidio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Athanasios PapatsorisSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens, GRC.
Ioannis VarkarakisSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens, GRC.
Iraklis MitsogiannisSecond Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio General Hospital, Athens, GRC.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSismanoglio General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to determine the effects of radical retropubic prostatectomy on post-operative erectile function. MATERIALS &

methodsA total of 50 patients were included in this study, diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, and underwent nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. All patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire pre-operatively and on the third, sixth, and twelfth post-operative month and completed a self-reporting of their satisfaction with their sexual performance. Patients with a history of severe heart disease, were on erectile dysfunction medication, or had a score of 7 or less on the IIEF-5 questionnaire, were excluded from the study.

resultsPre-operatively it was observed that the lower the IIEF-5 score, the higher the biopsy Gleason score. Post-operatively, 16 patients stated that erectile function had returned to the pre-operative IIEF-5 category. In contrast, only 13 of them stated they were happy with their sexual performance on the self-reporting scale. The rest reported dissatisfaction despite returning to their pre-operative erectile function status. IIEF-5 scores were also different when compared amongst the four age groups, with scores indicating that younger age is related to higher IIEF-5 scores. At the 3-month follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed between age groups. Finally, patients younger than 64 reported significantly less deterioration in post-operative erectile function.

conclusionPost-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction remains one of the most pressing issues in prostate cancer therapy. A higher Gleason score has a more significant impact on pre-operative ED, and at the same time, the best post-operative ED results are observed in younger patients. Finally, patients need extensive follow-up, therapy, and pre-and post-operative psychological support to have the best possible erectile function.

Indexed as

complicationserectile dysfunctionprostate cancerradical prostatectomyurologic oncology

Identifiers

PMID36883073
PMCPMC9985922
OpenAlexW4319073042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.