ReviewCureus2023
A Review on Autonomic Functional Assessment in Diabetic Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diabetes mellitus narrows frequency band range of low-frequency components in heart rate variability.Diabetology international · 2025Article
- Examination of the autonomic nervous system at the bedside.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Review
- Article
- Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus using Yoga: Implications for immunological and autonomic dysfunction.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Associations between Skin Autofluorescence Levels with Cardiovascular Risk and Diabetes Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Restoring Quality of Life: Assessing the Impact of Free Flap Reconstruction in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis Patients.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In today's world, science has progressed significantly, yet most people are still unaware of diabetes. Lack of obesity, physical work, and lifestyle changes are the main factors. Diabetes is becoming more common all around the globe. Type 2 diabetes may go unnoticed for years, resulting in serious consequences and high healthcare expenses. The goal of this study is to look at a wide range of studies in which the autonomic function of diabetic people has been studied with the help of various autonomic function tests (AFTs). AFT is a non-invasive approach to assessing patients for testing sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to stimuli. AFT findings give us comprehensive knowledge of the autonomic physiology reactions in normal and in autonomic diseases like diabetes. This review will concentrate on AFTs that are scientifically valid, trustworthy, and clinically beneficial, according to experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.