ArticleIranian endodontic journal2018
Comparison of Antibacterial Effect of Four Irrigation Solutions in Primary Root Canal Infections: A Clinical Study.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The conundrum of current endodontic disinfection strategies in microbial load reduction: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Identification and quantification ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Efficacy of Graphene Nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis: In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Assessment of Dentinal Tubules Penetration by Hyben X Delivered into the Root Canal System as an Irrigant; AnIranian endodontic journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reducing the bacterial count from the root canal system is one of the main stages in root canal treatment. The aim of the present clinical study was to compare the antibacterial effect of four intracanal irrigants in primary endodontic infections using both microbiological culture and quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) technique. Methods and Materials: Forty patients with primarily infected single rooted premolars were selected and then randomly divided into 4 groups according to the intra canal irrigant used: 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Hypoclean (Ogna Laboratori Farmaceutici, Muggiò, Italy), 2% chlorhexidine glouconate (CHX) and CHX-Plus (Vista Dental Products, Racine, WI, USA). Samples were collected before and after chemomechanical preparation and were evaluated by bacterial culture and RT-PCR technique for Results: Four irrigation solutions significantly reduced the total numbers of cultivable bacteria ( Conclusions: All tested irrigants including 5.25% NaOCl, Hypoclean, 2% CHX and CHX-Plus significantly reduced the number of bacterial colonies in primary endodontic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.