ArticleIranian endodontic journal2018
Histopathological Evaluation of Primary Teeth after Pulp Capping with Calcium-Enriched Mixture and Bioactive Glass.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive review of composition, properties, clinical applications, and future perspectives of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement: a systematic analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Pooled it
- Pulp Therapy of Primary Dentition; its Relevance despite Insufficient Histological Evidence: A Review.Iranian endodontic journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Direct pulp capping (DPC) is a conservative vital pulp therapy, which has some limitations in primary dentition. The aim of this study was to evaluate pulpal response of primary teeth after DPC with two biocompatible materials naming calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) and bioactive glass (BAG). Methods and Materials: This study was designed as a randomized clinical trial. After obtaining informed consent, 20 sound primary canines scheduled for orthodontic extraction, were selected. Following mechanical pulp exposure, the exposed site was capped with either CEM cement or BAG and then restored with amalgam. Teeth were extracted after two months and examined histopathologically. Parameters of hard tissue bridge (HTB) formation, its type and pulpal inflammation scores, were compared between the two groups. Data were analysed using the Fisher's exact test. Results: All CEM specimens showed inflammation scores of 0 (less than 10%). In the BAG group, inflammation scores of 0, 1 and 2 were observed in 7, 2 and 1 specimens, respectively. Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences ( Conclusion: Both CEM and BAG are suitable DPC agents in terms of HTB formation and pulp inflammation scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.