Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36883002›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Activation mechanism of the human Smoothened receptor.

Prateek D Bansal, Soumajit Dutta, Diwakar Shukla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic mechanism for subtype selectivity of endocannabinoids.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fully activated structure of the sterol-bound Smoothened GPCR-Gi protein complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prateek D BansalDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Soumajit DuttaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
Diwakar ShuklaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. Electronic address: diwakar@illinois.edu.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Elucidating sequence, structural and dynamic basis of the functional regulation of membrane proteinsR35GM142745 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SHUKLA, DIWAKAR · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoothened (SMO) is a membrane protein of the class F subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and maintains homeostasis of cellular differentiation. SMO undergoes conformational change during activation, transmitting the signal across the membrane, making it amenable to bind to its intracellular signaling partner. Receptor activation has been studied at length for class A receptors, but the mechanism of class F receptor activation remains unknown. Agonists and antagonists bound to SMO at sites in the transmembrane domain (TMD) and the cysteine-rich domain have been characterized, giving a static view of the various conformations SMO adopts. Although the structures of the inactive and active SMO outline the residue-level transitions, a kinetic view of the overall activation process remains unexplored for class F receptors. We describe SMO's activation process in atomistic detail by performing 300 μs of molecular dynamics simulations and combining it with Markov state model theory. A molecular switch, conserved across class F and analogous to the activation-mediating D-R-Y motif in class A receptors, is observed to break during activation. We also show that this transition occurs in a stage-wise movement of the transmembrane helices: TM6 first, followed by TM5. To see how modulators affect SMO activity, we simulated agonist and antagonist-bound SMO. We observed that agonist-bound SMO has an expanded hydrophobic tunnel in SMO's core TMD, whereas antagonist-bound SMO shrinks this tunnel, further supporting the hypothesis that cholesterol travels through a tunnel inside Smoothened to activate it. In summary, this study elucidates the distinct activation mechanism of class F GPCRs and shows that SMO's activation process rearranges the core TMD to open a hydrophobic conduit for cholesterol transport.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSignal TransductionCholesterolHedgehog ProteinsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationSmoothened ReceptorCholesterolHedgehog ProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSmoothened Receptor

Identifiers

PMID36883002
PMCPMC10111369
OpenAlexW4323308721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.