Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882831›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

A plastid phylogenomic framework for the palm family (Arecaceae).

Gang Yao, Yu-Qu Zhang, Craig Barrett, Bine Xue, Sidonie Bellot, William J Baker, Xue-Jun Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
28.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two novel species ofMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gang YaoCollege of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yu-Qu ZhangKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Craig BarrettDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Bine XueCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, 510225, China.
Sidonie BellotRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3AB, Surrey, UK.
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, TW9 3AB, Surrey, UK.
Xue-Jun GeKey Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. xjge@scbg.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5008-9475
Beijing Botanical Garden · CNRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBSouth China Agricultural University · CNWest Virginia University · USZhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences, China 151853KYSB20190027Chinese Academy of Sciences, China XDB31000000Chinese Academy of Sciences, China ZSSD-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, phylogenomics has greatly advanced our knowledge of angiosperm evolution. However, phylogenomic studies of large angiosperm families with complete species or genus-level sampling are still lacking. The palms, Arecaceae, are a large family with ca. 181 genera and 2600 species and are important components of tropical rainforests bearing great cultural and economic significance. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the family have been extensively investigated by a series of molecular phylogenetic studies in the last two decades. Nevertheless, some phylogenetic relationships within the family are not yet well-resolved, especially at the tribal and generic levels, with consequent impacts for downstream research.

resultsPlastomes of 182 palm species representing 111 genera were newly sequenced. Combining these with previously published plastid DNA data, we were able to sample 98% of palm genera and conduct a plastid phylogenomic investigation of the family. Maximum likelihood analyses yielded a robustly supported phylogenetic hypothesis. Phylogenetic relationships among all five palm subfamilies and 28 tribes were well-resolved, and most inter-generic phylogenetic relationships were also resolved with strong support.

conclusionsThe inclusion of nearly complete generic-level sampling coupled with nearly complete plastid genomes strengthened our understanding of plastid-based relationships of the palms. This comprehensive plastid genome dataset complements a growing body of nuclear genomic data. Together, these datasets form a novel phylogenomic baseline for the palms and an increasingly robust framework for future comparative biological studies of this exceptionally important plant family.

Indexed as

ArecaceaeMagnoliopsidaGenomicsPhylogenyPlastidsArecaceaeNuclear-plastid discordancePalmaePhylogenomicsPlastome

Identifiers

PMID36882831
PMCPMC9993706
OpenAlexW4323349576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.