Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Effect of platelet-rich plasma versus steroid injection in plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04985396 (Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Compared With Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Compared With Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive therapies for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injection for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Ultrasound-Guided Zhengqing Fengtongning vs Corticosteroid Injections for Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Short- and Long-Term Efficacy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Effect of percutaneous release versus steroid injection among adults with trigger fingers: a randomized clinical trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Plantar Fasciitis Research: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2010-2024.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Review
- Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treating Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Does local steroid injection have a prognostic value for endoscopic plantar fascia release in chronic plantar fasciopathy?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor: Ultrasound-guided injections for plantar fasciitis.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A Comparative Study of Platelet-Rich Plasma V/S Corticosteroid Injection for Plantar Fasciitis.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections in recovery from plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Platelet-rich plasma for de Quervain's tenosynovitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Medical and Surgical Specialties: Quality, Evaluation, Evidence, and Enforcement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The association between refractory plantar fasciitis and insertional Achilles tendinopathy and peripheral spondyloarthritis: a report of human leukocyte antigen B-27 investigation and treatment outcome.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Effects of Kinesiotape versus Low-Dye Tape on Pain and Comfort Measures in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ultrasound guided platelet rich plasma injections for post-traumatic greater occipital neuralgia following concussion: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The functional and molecular impact of triamcinolone acetonide on primary human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlantar fasciitis (PF) is a common orthopaedic problem, with heel pain worsening the quality of life. Although steroid injection is often used if the conservative treatment fails, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection is gaining popularity due to its safety and long-lasting effect. However, the effect of PRP versus steroid injection in PF has not been studied yet in Nepal. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of PRP compared with steroid injection in the treatment of PF.
methodsThis study was a single-center, hospital-based, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of PRP injection with steroid injection in plantar fasciitis between August 2020 and March 2022. A total of 90 randomly selected participants aged 18 to 60 years suffering from plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment were intervened. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring system were used to evaluate functional mobility and pain before and after the intervention for three and six months, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student's two-sample t-test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe PRP injection showed a better outcome than the steroid injection in six months follow-up. The mean (± SD) VAS score was significantly decreased in the PRP group (1.97 + 1.13) than in the steroid group (2.71 ± 0.94) with the group difference of -0.73 (95% CI: -1.18 to -0.28) at six months. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the AOFAS scores in the PRP group (86.04 ± 7.45) compared to the steroid group (81.23 ± 9.60) at six months of follow-up with a group difference of 4.80 (95% CI: 1.15 to 8.45). There was also a significant reduction of plantar fascia thickness in the PRP group compared to that of the steroid group (3.53 ± 0.81 versus 4.58 ± 1.02) at six months of follow-up with the group difference of -1.04 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.65).
conclusionThe PRP injection showed better outcomes than steroid injection in plantar fasciitis treatment over the course of six months. Further research with a larger population and longer follow-up than six months is needed to generalize the findings and their long-term efficacy.
trial registrationNCT04985396. First registered on 02 August 2021. ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04985396 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.