Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882788›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2023

Recent advances in the plant epitranscriptome.

Lisha Shen, Jinqi Ma, Ping Li, Yujin Wu, Hao Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. StALKBH10B-Mediated RNA mPlant biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Emerging roles of non-mNature plants · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Elevating RNA mNational science review · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Proteomics-based multi-omics reveals mPlant communications · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Role of mEpigenomes · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Landscape and mCell genomics · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisha ShenTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore. lisha@tll.org.sg.
Jinqi MaTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Ping LiTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Yujin WuTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Hao YuTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, 1 Research Link, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117604, Singapore. dbsyuhao@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-9778-8855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical modifications of RNAs, known as the epitranscriptome, are emerging as widespread regulatory mechanisms underlying gene regulation. The field of epitranscriptomics advances recently due to improved transcriptome-wide sequencing strategies for mapping RNA modifications and intensive characterization of writers, erasers, and readers that deposit, remove, and recognize RNA modifications, respectively. Herein, we review recent advances in characterizing plant epitranscriptome and its regulatory mechanisms in post-transcriptional gene regulation and diverse physiological processes, with main emphasis on N

Indexed as

5-MethylcytosineRNA5-MethylcytosineRNA

Identifiers

PMID36882788
PMCPMC9990323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.