Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36882756›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Exploration of how primary care models influence job satisfaction among primary care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Brunswick: a descriptive and comparative study.

Claire Johnson, Dominique Bourgoin, Jérémie B Dupuis, Jenny Manuèle Félix, Véronique LeBlanc, Danielle McLennan, Luveberthe St-Louis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of preferences and responses to recall in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claire JohnsonSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada. Claire.Johnson@umoncton.ca.
Dominique BourgoinSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.
Jérémie B DupuisSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.
Jenny Manuèle FélixSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.
Véronique LeBlancSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.
Danielle McLennanSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.
Luveberthe St-LouisSchool of Public Policy, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted human resource gaps and physician shortages in healthcare systems in New Brunswick (NB), as evidenced by multiple healthcare service interruptions. In addition, the New Brunswick Health Council gathered data from citizens on the type of primary care models (i.e. physicians in solo practice, physicians in collaborative practice, and collaborative practice with physicians and nurse practitioners) they use as their usual place of care. To add to their survey's findings, our study aims to see how these different primary care models were associated with job satisfaction as reported by primary care providers.

methodsIn total, 120 primary care providers responded to an online survey about their primary care models and job satisfaction levels. We used IBM's "SPSS Statistics" software to run Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare job satisfaction levels between variable groups to determine if there were statistically significant variations.

resultsOverall, 77% of participants declared being satisfied at work. The reported job satisfaction levels did not appear to be influenced by the primary care model. Participants reported similar job satisfaction levels regardless of if they practiced alone or in collaboration. Although 50% of primary care providers reported having symptoms of burnout and experienced a decline in job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary care model was not associated with these experiences. Therefore, participants who reported burnout or a decline in job satisfaction were similar in all primary care models. Our study's results suggest that the autonomy to choose a preferred model was important, since 45.8% of participants reported choosing their primary care models, based on preference. Proximity to family and friends and balancing work and family emerged as critical factors that influence choosing a job and staying in that job.

conclusionPrimary care providers' staffing recruitment and retention strategies should include the factors reported as determinants in our study. Primary care models do not appear to influence job satisfaction levels, although having the autonomy to choose a preferred model was reported as highly important. Consequently, it may be counterproductive to impose specific primary care models if one aims to prioritize primary care providers' job satisfaction and wellness.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansJob SatisfactionNew BrunswickPandemicsPrimary Health CareModels of carePhysician shortagePrimary carePrimary care providersRecruitmentRetention

Identifiers

PMID36882756
PMCPMC9990558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.